Go to search · Go to content · Go to Accessibility help
Logo Detail / Special Feature / Articles / Digital Library / ISN
 
Logo ETH Zürich

Logo ETH Zürich
Slogan: Managing Information - sharing knowledge

Find information

By subject

By region

Princes and Paupers: Inequality and Underdevelopment in South America

30 April 2012

Old map of South-America, courtesy of Douglas Fernandes/flickr
Creative Commons - Attribution 2.0 Generic Creative Commons - Attribution 2.0 Generic

Old map of the South-American continent dating from 1607

Despite similar origins, the historical trajectories of North and South America – social, political and economic – could hardly be more different. Will the same be true in the future?

Prepared by: ISN staff

 When looking to the past, the contrast between North and South America could hardly be more dramatic. In 1820, the GDP of Latin America was about 14 percent greater than that of the United States. Two hundred years later, US GDP more than doubles that of the entire region. Even more dramatic, as we explored in February , is the contrast with countries such as China and the ‘Asian Tigers’, which have achieved their prosperity relatively quickly when compared with South American states.

This week we puzzle over why progress (writ large) and the redistribution of power have occurred fitfully and incompletely in South America. We begin today with a critical evaluation of what is widely regarded as THE classic explanation of South American underachievement – Eduardo Galeano’s The Open Veins of Latin America, which claims that the continent’s woes are the legacy of interference and exploitation by its European conquerors and later by the United States.

Moderator Ken Livingston first discusses this argument with Alan Knight, Professor of Latin American History at Oxford University, and with Javier Farje of the Latin America Bureau, a research organization based in London.

Part 1:


Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported

Part 2:


Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported

Since Galeano wrote his groundbreaking text in the 1970s, however, it is important to emphasize that significant progress has been made in Latin America, particularly in terms of social indicators such as infant mortality.

Unfortunately, improved social indicators have not coincided with improved systemic-level economic growth, as the following graph illustrates:

Finally, we close with a different “take” by Christopher Sabatini, from Foreign Affairs magazine. He argues that poverty, inequality and under-development are rapidly becoming the wrong stories to tell about South America in the 21st century. Progress is indeed being made.

Additional Resources

 

University of Chicago, The False Promise of Populism in Latin America

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNhOLcmnhPU&feature=relmfu

 

Boston University, The Past and Future of Latin America

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxBzbu5shXA

 

How South America Stopped Listening to the U.S. and Started Prospering

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShFH9cu5z7s

 

University of Chicago, Poverty and Growth: Reflections on Latin America - Growth, Poverty, and Economic Development

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WKNmk2LxVA&feature=related

 

University of Chicago, The Weakness of the State in Latin America

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Z_lg-wbFpw&feature=relmfu

 

Publisher

Logo International Relations and Security Network (ISN)
License Logo

Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported

Share this:

Comments