Go to search · Go to content · Go to Accessibility help
Logo Detail / Dossiers / ISN
 
Logo ETH Zürich

Logo ETH Zürich
Slogan: Managing Information - sharing knowledge

Intelligence - Adapting to the Threats

CIA headquarters
Public Domain Public Domain

CIA headquarters

The origins of the modern intelligence agency can arguably be traced back to the beginning of the Cold War. Over the course of five decades, the West and its Warsaw Pact counterparts subsequently pursued increasingly ambitious intelligence programs that sought, among other things, to measure each other’s defense capabilities and to understand each other’s geopolitical calculations. In fact, the RAND Corporation’s Gregory F. Treverton argues that the primary responsibility of the United States’ intelligence agencies throughout the Cold War was to solve puzzles – i.e., to seek answers to questions that had them, even if we did not know what they were. To assist in this imperfect process, intelligence agencies on both sides of the Iron Curtain used signals (SIGINT) and human (HUMINT) intelligence in order to divine each other’s strengths and weaknesses. They did not always succeed.

Nor did Western agencies always succeed after the demise of the Soviet Union. For a considerable period of time, many of them were left without a strategic mandate or an adversary comparable to the former Soviet bloc. Moreover, their failure to predict a dramatic increase in extremist violence demonstrated that most agencies were not fit to conduct intelligence activities in a security environment that Treverton likens to a world of ‘mysteries’ rather than ‘puzzles’. These mysteries, in turn, lay buried in a sea of threat scenarios.

In order to better understand how intelligence agencies are trying to adapt to an age afflicted with the above problems and others (to include the challenges and opportunities presented by open source intelligence), we begin our analysis this week by first looking at the problem set intelligence agencies now confront. On Tuesday we then ask a fundamentally important question: does an era of open source intelligence, which we are now in, mean that we are all, in some way or another, intelligence operatives? This enquiry is followed on Wednesday with a look at how intelligence agencies have attempted to overcome problems associated with expanded intelligence sharing. We then round out our week by specifically looking at the intelligence gathering and reform efforts being pursued by a selection of European agencies and the United States.


Intel’s Rough Start to the 21st Century

29 Oct 2012 / Special Feature

Multiple failures since the turn of the century have prompted critics of Western intelligence agencies to question their effectiveness. The path to redemption, argue Joshua Rovner and Prem Mahadevan, depends on improved relationships with policymakers and further adjustments to new threats. More on «Intel’s Rough Start to the 21st Century»


Are We All Intelligence Agents Now?

30 Oct 2012 / Audio

The availability of large amounts of open source information has profoundly impacted the work of intelligence agencies over the past decade. In today’s podcast, Chris Pallaris discusses the risks and opportunities presented by this form of intelligence. More on «Are We All Intelligence Agents Now?»


Information Sharing in a Post-9/11 World

31 Oct 2012 / Special Feature

Sharing intelligence has always been driven by common interests, mutual trust and cooperative partnerships with like-minded agencies. In today’s question and answer session, the CSS’ Prem Mahadevan discusses the practical and strategic obstacles to this form of information sharing in the post 9/11 era. More on «Information Sharing in a Post-9/11 World»


Is Intelligence Reform Lagging in Europe?

01 Nov 2012 / Special Feature

Intelligence reform in Europe has not necessarily coincided with ongoing democratization. As a result, argues Peter Gill, many intelligence agencies appear to be operating outside of established democratic norms, to include transparency and parliamentary oversight. More on «Is Intelligence Reform Lagging in Europe?»


Intelligence Gathering and Reform: The Case of the United States

04 Jan 2013 / Special Feature

According to Gregory Treverton, US intelligence reform remains a work in progress. While reorienting the FBI and creating the National Counterterrorism Center represent progress, establishing the Department of Homeland Security and the position of Director of National Intelligence do not. More on «Intelligence Gathering and Reform: The Case of the United States»


Additional Content


Related Content